Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Darwin and Hegel: Views from the Past

G.W.F. Hegel’s “The African Character”

  • Focuses on the fundamental differences between Africans and Europeans as percieved in the Nineteenth century
  • Claims that “negroes” lack religion, and thus humanity
  • No conception of anything higher than themselves, which he views as a very negative attribute
  • Hegel also discusses how African people during this time enslaved and sold each other (even their relatives) and uses this as evidence that they are morally on a lower plane than whites.
  • Talks about traditions of African tribes, which he views as barbaric.
  • Closes his argument by stating European slavery (and its gradual abolition) is a good thing for the Africans, so they can acknowledge a “higher being” and that immediately ending slavery would have been a regression.
  • Finally, he claims Africa is historically irrelevant and that all the great societies of Africa were merely “not part of the African spirit.”

Darwin’s “On the Races of Man”

  • Talks about the intrinsic similarities of man amongst the many outward differences.
  • Gives a much more objective account that deals mostly with observed evidence of difference between the races of man.
  • Claims that all men share a common ancestor, thus meaning that at most, different races should be considered “sub-species.”
  • States that natural selection should be held accountable for the differences along the spectrum of humankind, not inferiority or superiority of certain ways of life.
  • Sums up his argument with the quote “[t]he great variability of all the external differences between the races of man, likewise indicates that the cannot be of much importance.”

1 comment:

  1. I'm pleased that Hegel matters enough to at least be cited. However, you do a disservice to rational thought when you compare the observations of a man who died in 1831 to those of another who died in 1882. At least Hegel based what he thought on the evidence available to him. You've chosen to ignore the 'evidence' of what evidence was available to both men. Moreover, if one would take the time to read Hegel's ideas, one would understand that Hegel is analyzing a culture, not a sub-species. Individual human beings are valuable to Hegel; the color of the skin isn't. To think that all cultures across time are 'equal', is to think that individual human beings are not that valuable as there can be no question that some cultures are superior to others in providing scope for the individuals reared in them to become enlightened.

    ReplyDelete